arkitect: (18)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
They consider even a flawed version of this war worthy of acknowledgement...?

Well, we all have our duties, some less pleasant than others. You have my sympathies for being placed in such a position.
arkitect: (18)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Mayhap it will not last long, given its nature, and you will be freed of it ere long.

[hm. he's curious, though.]

What will you do with yourself after?
arkitect: (15)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
It did seem somewhat out of place, for what you had said of yourself before.

[cyborg priest... but that makes much more sense in context, now.]

A protector of humanity then, are you-- do you care so greatly for them?
arkitect: (23)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
...I see. My condolences for the loss.

[he's a little quieter, there. hansa knows, on at least some level, that he understands loss well enough.]

So you would prevent the same happening to others, after such an experience.
arkitect: (18)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
How gracious of you.

[it's not dismissive like it might normally be, though, just- slightly quiet.

he has to wonder what would change, if hansa knew what emet-selch truly was. if he knew the things that he had done. whether he would accept the situation, be able to view it in the way that emet-selch has always seen it... or if hansa would look at him the way he does those creatures.

and if it turned out to be the latter-- would it be kinder to allow him an easy exit from whatever feelings he might harbor, rather than having that attachment to him?

there's a stretch of silence, there, where he seems to just be thinking.]
arkitect: (18)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
[he's tired as well, almost tempted to let his eyes slide shut for a few moments-- but then hansa speaks, and he glances back to him.]

Only considering.

[he debates, a moment, before he says all too casually:]

Were we from the same world, you may well have considered me one of your targets... though the situation in mine is quite different. Nevertheless, I am aware enough we are more often than not seen as villains.
arkitect: (23)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
Hardly.

[don't lump him in with vampires, wow...

but he considers just where to start, first.]


...some of the details of our earlier conversations have grown a bit hazy, but I do not believe I have ever told you what became of the world I showed you, once. It was broken, shattered into one primary fragment and ten and three more reflections of it-- and while I know not precisely how we survived, I am one of two whose souls remained whole.

To make a long explanation very short, however, in answer to your question: these fragmented worlds do not recognize themselves as broken. They view our efforts to return them to the whole quite differently than we do, as they do not have any understanding of their true state.
arkitect: (40)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
So we are, yes. It is akin to a division-- were you struck by the same blow that split our world, the result would be a fragmentation; individual existences, yes, but all weakened, all reduced in every aspect. Each separate one cannot truly be called alive any more than one would call a broken shard of ceramic a bowl.

...but they cling to such an existence regardless, unaware that they have lost both the world as it was and their own immortality. To them, we are not trying to restore something to them, but trying to take away what they know-- never realizing what they know is false.
arkitect: (23)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
To us, yes. To you, they would likely seem much like yourself. Yet they remain naught but fragments without full souls of their own, believing themselves truly alive and their worlds whole.

[a slight pause, there.]

In order to be absorbed back into the whole, they must cease existing in their current state.
arkitect: (22)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
...that, I do not know. 'Tis possible the soul remembers; from what I have seen, I do think it likely that at least something remains.
arkitect: (24)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
I do.

[he sounds certain of that.]

'Tis only that there are few opportunities to determine what a soul knows, for it may not be consciously aware. But as for its state... I am able to see any individual's soul, and with each rejoining, they become brighter. Still pale shadows of what they were, but more whole.
arkitect: (28)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
They should not, unless the world were sundered once more. But as for their memories...

[...he shakes his head.]

We have simply had to have faith in that. The soul must remember, else there would be none who dream of the end of a world they no longer know.
arkitect: (23)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-26 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
Not conscious ones, no. But one day, they may be... or so we hoped.

[it really is a shame i'm dying over it... hansa your RELIGION.]

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-26 04:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-26 04:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-26 05:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-26 05:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-26 05:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-26 05:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-26 05:53 (UTC) - Expand