robopriest: (espresso)
Hansa Cervantes ([personal profile] robopriest) wrote2020-09-27 08:33 pm
arkitect: (18)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-17 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
I think it certainly merits our attention, although I would caution against assuming the description to be perfectly literal. A monster need not be a beast.
arkitect: (4)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-17 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
Both are possible, just as it is possible that it truly is beastly. But without knowing more of it, I could not rightly say-- I only know that this all seems too complicated an arrangement to be dealing with something that lacks its own awareness and motivations.
arkitect: (25)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-17 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
Going after it without information on its nature will avail us little. Beyond that... it must be located in the first place, to even think of going further.
arkitect: (Default)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-17 05:52 am (UTC)(link)
Mayhap it is. But I was informed the places we are given leave to visit are places it has left in its wake. I would wager we are still catching up.
arkitect: (16)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-17 06:02 am (UTC)(link)
If what I was told holds true? That seems to be exactly the case.
arkitect: (46)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-17 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
As do I, but it does seem that much is held back. I do not believe we know why we visit such places yet.
arkitect: (4)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-17 06:13 am (UTC)(link)
In all ways except one, yes. They certainly do.
arkitect: (24)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-17 06:25 am (UTC)(link)
They seem otherwise normal. If it is consuming nova--

Then it is feeding not upon the places themselves, but upon what produces that nova. Going to the very source.
arkitect: (25)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-19 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
Very well, give me a moment--

[he was settled in, he's gotta get up... but it won't be long before he lets hansa in, though he sort of just. pops the door open and then steps back, to allow them both to keep their emotional space bubbles.]

Did you wish to speak of anything in particular, or were you simply looking for distraction?
arkitect: (46)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-19 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
Well, loathe as I am to confess to it, yesterday was the first I had heard the concept broached.

[which, yes, he definitely sounds miffed about. people who do not abide being out of loops well: emet-selch.]
arkitect: (16)

w3, monday

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-19 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
[what's up hansa, where are you hanging out today, because wherever it is-- emet-selch conveniently happens to wander across the same place, giving him a little nod in greeting.]

Ah, there you are. Good. As it so happens, there was something else I wished to speak with you about, have you the time for it.
arkitect: (Default)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-19 05:18 pm (UTC)(link)
[huh. he raises a brow, at that.]

No longer accessorizing, are you.

[give him a second to be curious, first.]
arkitect: (4)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-19 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
[and he raises a hand to his own neck, there.]

Well, I may simply misremember, but I did think you normally wore a piece of jewelry.

[just casually tossing the first bit in there, in case this is a Situation.]

Page 6 of 15